top of page

Tariffs: What They Are, Who Pays, and Why They Matter

  • Lox
  • Feb 14
  • 8 min read

Imagine you’re shopping for your favourite gadget and suddenly its price jumps overnight. One possible reason could be a new tariff. Tariffs frequently make headlines in trade disputes and economic news, but what exactly are they? In this guide, we’ll break down tariffs in simple terms – what a tariff is, who actually pays for it, and how it affects prices – and explore the history and debates surrounding this powerful tool of trade policy. By the end, you’ll have a clearer picture of how tariffs, despite their technical nature, shape our everyday economic lives.



What Is a Tariff and Why Do Governments Impose Them?


A tariff is essentially a tax on goods when they cross national borders. In practice, it usually means a tax on imports – products brought into a country from abroad – though in rare cases countries might tax exports as well. When an imported item arrives at customs, the importer must pay the tariff before the goods can enter the market.


Governments impose tariffs for several reasons. Historically, tariffs have been used as a way to raise revenue for governments. In earlier times, before income taxes became widespread, tariffs were a primary source of federal income.


Tariffs also serve to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. By adding a tax on imported goods, governments make these products more expensive compared to locally made alternatives. This can help local businesses thrive, at least in the short term.


Tariffs also act as a diplomatic tool. They can be used to respond to unfair trade practices by another country or to put pressure on a trading partner to change its policies. In this way, tariffs serve not just an economic function, but also a political one.



Who Pays for Tariffs?

It might seem obvious that when a country imposes a tariff, the foreign exporter should bear the cost. However, the responsibility to pay the tariff actually falls on the importing business. This company pays the tax to the government when the goods arrive at the border.


But the story doesn’t end there. Ultimately, the cost of a tariff is often passed along the supply chain. The importing business might raise the prices of goods to recoup the extra cost, meaning that consumers end up paying more. In some cases, foreign exporters may also absorb part of the cost by lowering their prices slightly, but the general trend is that tariffs increase the final cost for buyers.


Thus, while the government collects tariff revenue, the real burden often falls on domestic consumers and businesses that rely on imported goods.



How Tariffs Impact Consumer Prices and the Economy


Because tariffs raise the cost of imported products, they tend to push up consumer prices. For instance, if a popular imported item suddenly carries a new 20% tax, its price tag will likely rise accordingly. This is not just a theoretical outcome—real-world examples show that tariffs can cause noticeable price hikes.


When prices go up, consumers may end up spending more on the same items, which can lead to an overall increase in inflation. Moreover, higher costs for imported raw materials can make it more expensive for domestic companies to produce their goods, leading them to raise their prices as well. This creates a ripple effect that can slow down economic growth and even trigger job losses in industries that rely on global supply chains.


Tariffs are a double-edged sword. They may protect certain domestic industries by making imported goods less competitive, but they also create winners and losers. While domestic producers might benefit from reduced competition, the higher prices hurt consumers and can disrupt industries that depend on international trade. In cases where tariffs escalate into a trade war, the result is often an even broader economic slowdown.



A Brief History of Tariffs in the United States


Tariffs have played a pivotal role in American history. In the early days of the republic, tariffs were one of the primary ways the fledgling government raised revenue. One of the first laws passed by Congress was a tariff act designed to generate the funds needed for the young nation.


Early American leaders believed that tariffs could also nurture the nation’s emerging industries. By taxing imports, the U.S. could protect its own manufacturers until they were strong enough to compete on a global stage. Throughout the 1800s, tariffs were instrumental in shielding industries such as textiles and iron works from being overwhelmed by cheaper foreign products.

However, tariffs also sparked fierce debates. The industrial North generally favoured high tariffs to protect its growing factories, while the agricultural South, which depended on exporting goods and importing inexpensive manufactured products, argued for lower tariffs. This tension came to a head with tariffs so high that some regions even threatened to nullify them, setting the stage for major political conflicts.


After the Civil War, tariffs continued to be a cornerstone of U.S. economic policy. High tariffs were embraced to support industries like steel and machinery, though opinions on their merits began to shift. The introduction of the federal income tax in the early 20th century reduced the government's reliance on tariffs for revenue, and the disastrous economic consequences of the 1930 tariff hikes during the Great Depression made clear that protectionist policies can sometimes backfire spectacularly.


In response to the economic turmoil of the 1930s, the U.S. began a gradual shift toward freer trade. This shift was further accelerated after World War II with the creation of international bodies like the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and, later, the World Trade Organization (WTO), which aimed to reduce global trade barriers. The U.S. also entered into regional free trade agreements, such as NAFTA (and later USMCA), that eliminated most tariffs among member countries, deepening economic integration.



Modern Examples of Tariffs in Action

Let’s bring the concept of tariffs into the present day with a couple of modern examples.


The U.S.–China Trade War

In 2018, the United States launched a series of steep tariffs on Chinese imports, marking the start of a heated trade dispute. The U.S. imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods—from electronics and clothing to machinery and steel. The stated reasons were to address unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and to reduce the U.S. trade deficit. China responded with its own tariffs on U.S. exports, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation. The impact was clear: many American companies saw rising costs, and consumers began to feel the pinch as prices for goods increased. Though a partial trade deal later eased some tensions, many of these tariffs remain, serving as a reminder of how interconnected modern trade policy is.


Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

Also in 2018, the U.S. imposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to protect domestic producers on the grounds of national security. A 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminium were levied on imports from various countries. While these measures helped American metal producers, they also increased costs for industries that use these materials—like automotive manufacturers and construction companies. The higher costs eventually made their way to consumers, with everyday products becoming more expensive. Moreover, the move sparked retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, straining relationships even with close allies.



Tariffs and Free Trade Agreements: Opposites on the Trade Spectrum


If tariffs are one way to manage trade by adding friction and cost, free trade agreements (FTAs) are the opposite approach – they strive to remove barriers and make trade as seamless as possible. Many nations have signed FTAs to mutually reduce or eliminate tariffs, boosting cross-border commerce and economic integration.


A prime example is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which came into effect in 1994. NAFTA created a tariff-free zone between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, allowing goods to move almost seamlessly between the three countries. This agreement not only lowered prices but also strengthened regional supply chains. Today, NAFTA has evolved into the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which continues to promote tariff-free trade in North America.


Globally, organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) have played a significant role in curbing tariff levels worldwide. The WTO provides a platform where countries agree on standard tariff rates and offers a way to resolve disputes when trade rules are broken. While not all tariffs have disappeared, the overall trend has been toward lower barriers, a testament to the belief that free trade can bring about shared prosperity.



Protectionism vs. Free Trade: The Big Economic Debate


At the heart of the tariff discussion lies a long-standing debate: protectionism versus free trade. Protectionism argues that tariffs help shield domestic industries and jobs from unfair competition. The idea is that, by making imported goods more expensive, local businesses can flourish and provide employment for citizens.


However, the free trade camp emphasizes that removing barriers allows countries to specialize in what they do best. This concept of comparative advantage suggests that every nation benefits when each focuses on its strengths and trades for the rest. Free trade tends to lower prices for consumers, spur innovation, and boost overall economic growth.

While tariffs can offer short-term protection to certain sectors, they often do so at the cost of higher prices and reduced efficiency across the board. The reality is a mixed bag: some industries gain, while others lose, and the overall economic impact is a balancing act between immediate protection and long-term prosperity.



Conclusion

Tariffs may seem like an abstract or technical economic concept, but they have very real effects on everyday life – from the cost of the gadgets you love to the overall health of the economy. In simple terms, a tariff is a tax on imports used to raise revenue, protect domestic industries, or negotiate better trade deals. However, while tariffs may help shield certain sectors, they often come with the hidden cost of higher prices for consumers and disrupted supply chains.


The history of U.S. tariffs—from the early days of nation-building to the dramatic trade wars of the 20th century—teaches us that trade policies are never one-dimensional. Modern examples like the U.S.–China trade war and the steel and aluminium tariffs illustrate how policies intended to protect can have far-reaching impacts, rippling through our economy and affecting everyone.


Ultimately, the debate between protectionism and free trade remains a balancing act. While tariffs can serve as a short-term shield for domestic industries, the broader benefits of free trade—more choices, lower prices, and stronger economic growth—often outweigh these protections. As the global economy evolves, understanding how tariffs work and who ultimately pays for them is key to navigating the complex dance of international trade.


So next time you hear about tariffs in the news, remember: they’re more than just a tax on imports—they’re a critical piece of the puzzle that connects global markets, influences policy, and shapes the economic story of our time.


In the simplest notion, tariffs could appear to be exceptionally favourable for a nation such as America where consumerism is a dramatic part of daily life and the economy. They favour domestic products that are made from start to finish in the nation. They provide a clear argument on the surface for companies to manufacture domestically.


But the troubles lie in scratching the surface.


It is not uncommon for domestic goods to raise prices to match the new raised prices of imported goods to maximally capitalise on potential profit, equalling cost increases across the board.

And Company A might consider the cost of moving advanced manufacturing infrastructure to the US to likely be a net loss when they can simply raise their prices, perhaps suffer a short term downturn, and wait out the present policy until the next administration reduces tariffs.

This then allows them to increase their prices against the reduced tariff. On the surface this appears as though prices are overall coming down, but the reality is that the company is now able to make more profit after the tariff ends at the inflationary cost to the consumer.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page